Reconfiguring Strategic Decision Making through Dynamic Managerial Capabilities in Conditions of Digital Uncertainty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijems.v4i5.87Keywords:
Dynamic Managerial Capabilities; Strategic Decision Making; Digital Uncertainty; Strategic Management; Digital TransformationAbstract
The rapid advancement of digital technologies has increased organizational uncertainty, requiring adaptive strategic decision-making processes. This study examines the influence of dynamic managerial capabilities on strategic decision making and the role of digital uncertainty in shaping this relationship. Using a mixed-method approach with a sequential explanatory design, this research involved a quantitative survey of 150 managers and organizational decision-makers, followed by in-depth interviews with 15 key informants. Quantitative data were analyzed using moderated regression analysis, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. The findings reveal that dynamic managerial capabilities positively influence strategic decision-making through managerial abilities to recognize changes, utilize experience, and build networks. Digital uncertainty strengthens the relationship between dynamic managerial capabilities and strategic decision-making effectiveness. This study contributes to strategic management theory and provides practical insights for adaptive digital transformation strategies
References
Al-Moaid, N. A., & Almarhdi, S. G. (2024). Developing dynamic capabilities for successful digital transformation projects: The mediating role of change management. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00446-9
Bouncken, R. B., Kraus, S., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Knowledge management in agile organizations: The role of strategic flexibility. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(8), 2091–2111. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2020-0894
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use thematic analysis? Should I use thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2020.1750647
Bresciani, S., Huarng, K. H., Malhotra, A., & Ferraris, A. (2021). Digital transformation as a springboard for product, process and business model innovation. Journal of Business Research, 128, 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.021
Ciriello, R. F., Richter, A., & Schwabe, G. (2021). Digital transformation: Challenges and opportunities for organizational decision making. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00677-9
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2023). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods research/book241842
Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13, 215–246.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2020). Entrepreneurial judgment and the strategic management of resources. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1336
Gong, C., & Ribiere, V. (2021). Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation, 102, 102217.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102217
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2021). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3143
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Heubeck, T. (2024). Looking back to look forward: A systematic review of and research agenda for dynamic managerial capabilities. Management Review Quarterly, 74, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00345-5
Kane, G. C., Phillips, A. N., Copulsky, J., & Andrus, G. R. (2021). The technology fallacy: How people are the real key to digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/
Kraus, S., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047576
Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466
Kump, B., Engelmann, A., Kessler, A., & Schweiger, C. (2021). Toward a dynamic capabilities view of innovation capability. Journal of Business Research, 128, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.017
McKim, C. A. (2020). The value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819872422
Mikalef, P., van de Wetering, R., & Krogstie, J. (2020). Building dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics: The role of organizational inertia. Information & Management, 57(6), 103324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103324
Mikalef, P., Conboy, K., & Lundström, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability and organizational decision-making. Information & Management, 58(8), 103540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103540
Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: A review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 71, 233–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7
Palinkas, L. A., Mendonça, A., & Hamilton, A. B. (2020). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 47, 685–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-020-01072-1
Ritter, T., & Pedersen, C. L. (2020). Digitization capability and its impact on business model innovation and performance: The moderating role of environmental turbulence. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(4), 706–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.03.003
Schoonenboom, J. (2022). The logic of mixed methods research: Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(6), 739–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1940810
Teece, D. J. (2020). Hand in glove: Open innovation and the dynamic capabilities framework. Strategic Management Review, 1(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1561/111.00000010
van de Wetering, R., Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2021). Strategic alignment between IT flexibility and dynamic capabilities: An empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1919946
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing Digital Transformation, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101573
Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2020). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101017
